should I upload my music as mp3 or flac
Gear Head
MP3 vs Wav file for Spotify via Distrokid
I am up loading some songs (produced on Cubase Pro 10) to Spotify via Distrokid.
Distrokid accepts wav files simply just upward to 24 bit.
Spotify recommends FLAC (which I tin can't do from Cubase Pro 10) or wav files but seems to have mp3 files rendered at 32 scrap.
Am I better off uploading wav files at 24 bit (with dithering presumably) or mp3 produced at 32 flake floating by cubase pro 10?
Will there be a noticable difference and is information technology worth me taking down four erstwhile songs previously sent in mp3 form and replacing them with wav files?
Many thank you for your advice.
Reub
Lives for gear
Unless the spotify system will accept your mp3 without transcoding it at all (unlikely), using lossless would surely exist a better idea?
What I know about lossy audio and video codecs is, y'all want to avoid transcoding from lossy to some other lossy like the plague
Quote:
Originally Posted by reubenayres ➡️
I am up loading some songs (produced on Cubase Pro 10) to Spotify via Distrokid.
Distrokid accepts wav files just only up to 24 chip.
Spotify recommends FLAC (which I tin't practice from Cubase Pro 10) or wav files just seems to accept mp3 files rendered at 32 flake.
Am I improve off uploading wav files at 24 bit (with dithering presumably) or mp3 produced at 32 bit floating past cubase pro 10?
Will at that place exist a noticable divergence and is it worth me taking downwards four erstwhile songs previously sent in mp3 grade and replacing them with wav files?
Many thanks for your advice.
Reub
Of form yous can render as FLAC out of Cubase!
Gear Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by submarin ➡️
Of course you lot can render as FLAC out of Cubase!
Thank you. Of grade you lot're right - it was staring me in the face and I just didn't see it.
Many thanks
Gear Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm2c ➡️
Unless the spotify organization will accept your mp3 without transcoding it at all (unlikely), using lossless would surely be a better idea?
What I know almost lossy audio and video codecs is, you desire to avoid transcoding from lossy to another lossy like the plague
Thank you very much. That'due south very helpful.
Cheers
Lives for gear
what's incorrect with sending 24 bit wav files...remember a CD is simply 16 fleck.....
If you're having your material mastered, which I hope you are if it's going to a commercial platform, then the end upshot will exist sixteen bit for CD or 24 bit if y'all're going for a college quality download service provider.
M
Gear Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by norbury brook ➡️
what's incorrect with sending 24 bit wav files...call up a CD is only sixteen bit.....
If you're having your cloth mastered, which I hope you are if information technology'southward going to a commercial platform, and then the finish result will be xvi bit for CD or 24 chip if you're going for a higher quality download service provider.
Thou
Cheers. That's very helpful.
Cheers
Gear Head
OK - so the adjacent question is; having uploaded iv songs already as mp3s, would it be sensible to delete them from Spotify, iTunes etc and replace them with wav files?
Many thanks
Reub
Lives for gear
Depends on how much plays its getting I approximate.. if its going downwardly well, maybe consider timing the file replacement well?
If information technology was my stuff I'd replace ASAP unless it was doing really adept
Gear Head
Quote:
Originally Posted past jm2c ➡️
Depends on how much plays its getting I guess.. if its going downwardly well, maybe consider timing the file replacement well?
If it was my stuff I'd supersede ASAP unless it was doing actually skilful
I have your indicate. I think information technology'southward time to remaster and replace the one-time songs.
Many thanks
Gear Head
The Spotify streaming formats are OGG (for desktop, mobile, tablet apps) and AAC (for the Web Player). So a MP3 file submitted for distribution on Spotify would most certainly undergo lossy file to lossy file transcoding, which may upshot in audible artifacts. Your best bet is to submit 24-chip/44.1 kHz WAV files as delivery masters to DistroKid. This is what I recommend to all of my clients using DistroKid for digital distribution.
As an aside, information technology is true that Spotify prefers FLAC files, but they volition also accept WAV files without complaint.
Lives for gear
I'm personally a bit broken-hearted about using FLAC. IME the file format is a bit problematic and many software plays it dorsum incorrectly, skipping frames and whatnot. I've also had FLAC files decadent on me a few times, which ruined the files forever every bit compressed files cannot be as easily recovered using file repair software as linear audio files.
Gear Head
Thank you lot all for your very helpful replies. I'one thousand very grateful to you all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm2c ➡️
I'1000 personally a bit anxious about using FLAC. IME the file format is a chip problematic and many software plays it back incorrectly, skipping frames and whatnot. I've too had FLAC files corrupt on me a few times, which ruined the files forever every bit compressed files cannot be as hands recovered using file repair software as linear sound files.
Only because "software plays it back incorrectly" means that distrokid or whatsoever of the streaming outlets would practise whatever "whatnots", does it? If a distributor say they tin handle FLAC, why not believe them?
Distributing lossy files to streaming services is a fool'due south errand, still. Unless one knows exactly what one's doing.
Lives for gear
Quote:
Originally Posted past Mikael B ➡️
Merely because "software plays information technology dorsum incorrectly" means that distrokid or whatsoever of the streaming outlets would do any "whatnots", does it? If a distributor say they can handle FLAC, why not believe them?
Distributing lossy files to streaming services is a fool'southward errand, notwithstanding. Unless one knows exactly what one's doing.
Sending a FLAC file for distribution doesn't seem similar information technology has any benefits is all. If they also accept PCM WAV/AIFF, I'd always prefer sending in those formats instead. If thats not an option then sure, FLAC rather than MP3 whatsoever 24-hour interval.
Just my 2 cents (jm2c)
Gear Caput
Quote:
Originally Posted past jm2c ➡️
Sending a FLAC file for distribution doesn't seem like it has any benefits is all. If they too accept PCM WAV/AIFF, I'd always prefer sending in those formats instead. If thats not an choice then sure, FLAC rather than MP3 any mean solar day.
Just my 2 cents (jm2c)
Many thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted past jm2c ➡️
many software plays information technology back incorrectly
Name that software.
It will likewise assist developers fix information technology, because that surely isn't supposed to happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm2c ➡️
Sending a FLAC file for distribution doesn't seem like it has any benefits is all.
It has at least the following benefits compared to WAV/AIFF:
1. smaller file size, which helps reduce both storage and bandwidth costs
2. better metadata back up
3. built-in checksum of the audio data, which makes it much easier to bank check file integrity
So I see very little reason non to use FLAC for distribution.
Source: https://gearspace.com/board/music-computers/1304507-mp3-vs-wav-file-spotify-via-distrokid.html
0 Response to "should I upload my music as mp3 or flac"
Post a Comment